RESIST AND 'A MUST One" tool "to put under observation in throughout the European Union people considered "radical." This was adopted on 26 April, the Council for General Affairs Council of the European Union, without debate, gave his consent to the conclusions "on the use of a standardized instrument, multi-dimensional and semi-structured for collecting data and information on the processes of radicalization in the EU." The decision is passed virtually unnoticed. Still heavily affect the lives of millions of people. Why the "tool" mentioned in the plan will not put under observation for those who plan to implement terrorist acts - indeed, against them, the criminal prosecution already exists. As opposed to the detailed document (and secret) explicitly states that in the end, even seeks people who express opinions placeable ideological in a "far-right / left, Islamist, nationalist, anti-globalization etc. ...».
The "instrument" should prevent people from approaching terrorism through the "radicalization." How? First, analyzing the "different environments" in which case the "radicalization" and, secondly, through the introduction of "systematic way" to exchange information about individuals or groups that use hate speech (hate speech) or inciting terrorismo.Verranno radical leaders exchanged information on sponsors of terrorism and their movements will be followed in order to "stop the process of radicalization or to notify a state of alert against them "The alarm could then trigger actions, such as questioning, putting a person under surveillance, or even in prison, and so on.
Meanwhile, Europol will be asked to "create lists of those who are involved in radicalizing / recruit radicalizing or transmit messages, and to take appropriate measures." At first glance, these plans to counter terrorism seem a logical step. But this impression only lasts until you look at the secret document that was the basis of the conclusions. It 'clear that the objective are not the people or groups who have committed or have plans to commit terrorist acts, or those who incite the use of terrorism, as both can be countered through the use of criminal law (arrest, indictment, sentence, etc.).. Rather, the aim is people and groups who support the radical ideas that are described as those who spread the "rm" (radical messages). How to define who is in the 'extreme left' or who is' Islamist 'or' anti-globalization "? Who will be responsible for identifying the area of \u200b\u200bpolitical affiliation of the "radical"? But not only. Who will use this "tool" that would put under surveillance a wide arc of individuals and groups? And finally, how the information collected will be used?
The document provides only partial answers to these questions. But worthy of note are the 70 questions that users of the "tool" must fill. Presumably, the 70 questions will be based on intelligence gathering personal data and surveillance. Some are truly bizarre, others that show how this activity will be intrusive for those that fall in the "web of suspicion" of the state. Some examples: "Economic situation? Unemployed or worsening of its economic position, etc... " Or. 'Psychological characteristics relevant? Psychological disorders, charismatic personality, weak personality, etc... " There are millions of people with ideas in the EU "Radical" and could easily, according to their terminology, use of the theories that have also invested in the so-called "rm", without having any intention of using or encouraging the use of violence. Any person "radical" could be targeted, and political life may be contaminated by the suspects produced by agencies of the Member without these being visible and without which no one should be accountable. The debate and legitimate political activity undertaken outside could become yet another victim of the "war on terror."
THERE AS YOU WILL EVER WANT YOU!
