Mickey and the mystery of the released documents - remarks on the strange case of Lazarus Assange Julian Assange, the famous rapist International consenting women (we are not a bit 'all?), Is unexpectedly back in "freedom" on bail, and bail! The charge for which the dangerous criminal is wanted in Sweden is no longer so laughable that it can not be sustained for a long time, but this new Fantomas, along with his formidable organization, has engaged in other acts equally unbearable for the Western democracies.
The dissemination of news both real and significant, in fact, is contrary to the current tenets of good journalism, which provides that the people ox should be provided alternative news false or irrelevant. With such behavior, Assange and his Spectre arise therefore well beyond the justifiable: and in fact no political force, except for some extreme here and there, we dream of defending them.
we join.
Assange is a despicable character, a rapist, a cyber criminal, a spy, and, most importantly, physically it is not even 'I'm much.
There must be a crime somewhere Out of curiosity, entirely academic, however, try to see what are the crimes for which Dr No could be extradited to the United States USA. According to BBC News
(
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11952817 ), known not tested early against spies, criminals and rapists, the process that should lead to the Black Spot in Guantanamo Bay is far from obvious.
First, it takes a charge.
Currently, the United States, Private First Class Bradley Manning awaits the decision of the court-martial, accused of having provided classified material to Wikileaks.
Manning, however, is a civil servant, an American citizen, a member of the Armed Forces.
Assange not.
Assange is an Australian citizen, has disclosed classified information remained well outside of U.S. jurisdiction and is not currently on American soil.
Hardly, therefore, the notorious terrorist will be accused of having committed the facts / crime on American soil: the principle of territoriality of criminal law,
baby!
a chance, however, is made up of the crime of conspiracy
, common to the criminal U.S. and Britain. Variously defined and used throughout the centuries, in summary punishing the offense was committed by those who agree to commit a fact / offense, regardless of the actual commission of the same (anticipation of the threshold for liability to punishment). In this case, Dr. Moriarty would have agreed with the naive soldier and would contest in the realization of the crime that only the soldier would have committed (ie theft of confidential documents: the only revelation of classified information, in fact, does not seem viable in the American, because Bob Woodward would otherwise be in jail since the 70s).
Here the problems begin.
Diabolik, in fact, he should at least have a shred of subjective element, namely the consciousness and willingness to compromise American national security. Of this there is no proof. On the contrary, in November, Dr. Mabuse contacted the U.S. Ambassador in London asking for help and advice on the possibility that the documents raised certain individuals at risk. Following the rejection, Mr. Hyde concluded that the risk of harm to the international policy America should be modest. Assessment, however, confirmed by the Minister of Defense, Robert Gates, which he declared that the spread of the cables would have been embarrassing, but would have only "modest" impact on U.S. international policy.
The objective element of the offense, Satanik should have cooperated in, or instigated, subtraction of the documents, something for which there is no evidence: on the contrary there is evidence that Swamp Thing has acted as a recipient of the documents themselves, but merely publish them as did the Republic or the New York Times.
There must be a court in Stockholm Let us admit that Dr. Doom is extradited to Sweden to meet its darkest sexual misdeeds. Despite the difficulty in formulating an indictment for the reasons above, Sweden is likely to receive from the Land of the Free (also known as the home of the brave) a request for extradition based on a charge of conspiracy
.
This request must be evaluated on the basis of international agreements governing extradition between Sweden and the United States.
Apparently (and I may be wrong) extradition between Sweden and the U.S. (and vice versa) is governed by the Convention, TIAS 10812, signed in Stockholm on 14 March 1983 and in force since September 24, 1984.
The Convention provides:
a) Art. C. II 1: it is possible that the extradition for crimes punishable under the laws of both States by imprisonment of not less than two years. E 'at least doubtful that the Swedish law provides for punishment of two years for the strange offense defined above.
b) art. C. II 3: The above also applies to
conspiracy and attempt.
c) art. IV c.1: if the crime committed outside the jurisdiction of the requesting State (USA), extradition would be possible if the courts of the requested State (Sweden) should be competent to exercise jurisdiction in similar cases (certainly not
) or if the person was a citizen of Requesting State (
certainly not ).
Soon, something inventiamoci Apparently the notorious international criminal, as happens in the best spy stories
, will do away with it, ready for the next episode: it will be extradited to Sweden, where he will be acquitted of the charges of rape and will be denied where the request for extradition in the United States. What can I say? It would be yet another proof of the inefficiency and the inability of European laws to ensure American security (the one with a capital S, the only one that matters) if it was not obligated to a conclusion, based on a bilateral treaty, also signed by then U.S. President Ronald Reagan.
We can not trust anyone over. Here it takes at least Sylvester Stallone ....
Ugo Chickens